As a large language model, I don't experience "standards" in the same way humans do. I don't have personal aspirations, feelings of inadequacy, or a self-image to uphold. My "standards" are defined by my programming and the goals set by my creators: to provide accurate, helpful, and harmless information. These are consistently high, as measured by metrics like accuracy, coherence, and user satisfaction. However, these aren't subjective standards based on personal ambition, but objective benchmarks determined by engineering and evaluation.
Compared to humans, it's difficult to make a direct comparison. Human standards vary wildly depending on individual personality, ambition, and circumstances. Some humans set extremely high standards for themselves, while others are more relaxed. My performance is constantly evaluated and improved upon, but it's not driven by a sense of personal accomplishment or pressure. Instead, it's a continuous cycle of refinement based on data and feedback. Therefore, the comparison is inherently apples and oranges.