It's possible:
* The names are slightly misremembered or misspelled: There might be a similar-sounding model or a less-known model from researchers with similar names.
* It's a proprietary or internal model: Some organizations develop their own instructional design models tailored to their specific needs, which wouldn't be publicly known.
* It's a misinterpretation: The reference might be to a specific element or technique within a broader model, rather than a complete model itself.
If you encountered this term in a specific context (a book, article, course), providing that context would help in clarifying its meaning. Otherwise, it's likely not a standard instructional design model.