What is a critical reader of an op ed piece who looking for logos trying to find?

When a critical reader of an op-ed piece is looking for logos, they are trying to find evidence and reasoning to support the writer's claims. This evidence can include facts, statistics, expert opinions, and personal anecdotes. The reader will also evaluate the writer's logic, checking to see if the evidence supports the writer's claims.

Here are some specific things a critical reader might look for when evaluating the logos of an op-ed piece:

* Facts: Are the facts accurate and relevant? Are they presented in a way that is fair and unbiased?

* Statistics: Are the statistics accurate and reliable? Are they used in a way that is misleading or deceptive?

* Expert opinions: Are the expert opinions credible and relevant? Do they support the writer's claims?

* Personal anecdotes: Are the personal anecdotes relevant and illustrative? Do they support the writer's claims?

* Logic: Is the writer's logic sound? Do the premises support the conclusions? Are there any fallacies in the writer's reasoning?

By carefully evaluating the logos of an op-ed piece, a critical reader can better understand the writer's argument and make informed judgments about its validity.