Would a statement that relys primarily on denotative language lilely to be factual?

Yes, a statement that relies primarily on denotative language is more likely to be factual. Denotative language is language that has a clear and unambiguous meaning. It is often used in scientific and technical writing, where it is important to be precise and accurate. Statements that rely on denotative language are therefore more likely to be true and accurate than statements that rely on connotative language.

Connotative language, on the other hand, is language that has a subjective or emotional meaning. It is often used in literature and poetry, where it is used to create a particular mood or atmosphere. Statements that rely on connotative language are therefore less likely to be factual, as they are more open to interpretation.

For example, the statement "the sky is blue" is a factual statement that uses denotative language. The sky is objectively blue, and there is no ambiguity about the meaning of the statement. However, the statement "the sky is beautiful" is a subjective statement that uses connotative language. The beauty of the sky is a matter of opinion, and there is no objective way to determine whether or not it is beautiful.

In general, statements that rely on denotative language are more likely to be factual than statements that rely on connotative language. This is because denotative language is clear and unambiguous, while connotative language is subjective and open to interpretation.