Arguments for Kyo being a "good" character:
* He demonstrates significant personal growth: Throughout the series, Kyo grapples with his anger, insecurities, and the curse affecting him. He learns to trust others, overcome his deep-seated resentment, and accept himself. This arc of self-improvement is a key aspect of his character.
* He cares deeply for others: While often outwardly abrasive, Kyo shows genuine care and affection for Tohru and his friends. He protects those he loves and is willing to make sacrifices for them.
* He fights against injustice: He challenges the unfairness and cruelty inherent in the Sohma family curse and societal expectations placed upon him.
Arguments for Kyo being a "bad" character (or at least, flawed):
* He is frequently violent and aggressive: Kyo's anger issues lead to him lashing out physically and emotionally, causing harm to himself and others. This is a significant flaw.
* He struggles with self-control: His inability to control his emotions often creates conflict and hurts his relationships.
* He harbors deep-seated resentment and bitterness: For much of the series, Kyo is driven by his hatred towards Yuki and his desire to prove himself superior. This negatively impacts his actions and relationships.
Conclusion:
Kyo is ultimately a morally grey character. He's capable of both great kindness and terrible cruelty, reflecting his internal struggles and emotional turmoil. His journey is one of overcoming these flaws and becoming a better person. Whether you consider him "good" or "bad" depends on how you weigh his positive character development against his negative actions and traits. He's far more interesting and relatable as a flawed but ultimately redeemable character.