Reconsideration: A correctional explanation begins with reassessing the existing explanation, identifying areas where it falls short or could be improved. This might involve revisiting the underlying assumptions, evidence, or reasoning used in the original explanation.
Inclusion of New Evidence: In light of new evidence, a correctional explanation integrates this information into the explanation. It considers how the new evidence contributes to or challenges the previous explanation and adjusts accordingly.
Addressing Counterarguments: A correctional explanation addresses any counterarguments or critiques of the original explanation. It provides responses to objections or alternative viewpoints, addressing their strengths and weaknesses.
Reconciling Inconsistencies: If inconsistencies or gaps arise between the existing explanation and new findings, a correctional explanation aims to reconcile these inconsistencies or provide plausible explanations for them.
Enhanced Understanding: Ultimately, the goal of a correctional explanation is to enhance the overall understanding of the phenomenon or event being explained. It aims to refine, clarify, or extend the original explanation, bringing it closer to a more accurate, complete, and consistent account.
Examples:
1. Scientific Theories: In science, theories may undergo corrections as new research findings become available. For instance, the geologic theory of plate tectonics was adjusted to include the concept of "microplates" based on evidence found on the ocean floor.
2. Historical Narratives: Historians regularly revisit and reinterpret historical events based on newly discovered documents, archaeological evidence, or re-evaluations of past interpretations.
3. Medical Research: In medicine, new breakthroughs can lead to the modification of earlier treatments or therapies. For instance, advances in genetics have altered our understanding of certain diseases and subsequently changed treatment approaches.
4. Legal Interpretation: In the field of law, precedents and interpretations of constitutional rights are modified and revised over time to reflect evolving societal attitudes and interpretations.
Correctional explanations demonstrate the dynamic nature of knowledge acquisition and understanding. They acknowledge that explanations are subject to revision and improvement as new information emerges or as insights change. Ultimately, correctional explanations contribute to the cumulative scientific, historical, or cultural understanding of the world around us.