- This criterion refers to the student’s understanding and command of the subject matter covered in the exam.
- The accuracy and depth of knowledge the student demonstrates in their responses are key factors considered.
- Teachers award full marks for a comprehensive and well-presented demonstration of understanding, partial marks for a moderate level of comprehension, and no marks for an inadequate or irrelevant response.
2. Application : Maximum marks 2
- This criterion evaluates the student’s ability to apply the concepts and knowledge they’ve learned to new and different situations.
- It assesses how effectively they can transfer their knowledge to practical scenarios and solve problems.
- Teachers assign full marks for skillfully and correctly applying the knowledge to new contexts, partial marks for some degree of application, and no marks for an entirely irrelevant response.
3. Analysis : Maximum marks 2
- This criterion assesses the student’s capacity for in-depth analysis of information or content.
- Teachers examine the student’s ability to break down complex ideas into their fundamental components, identify patterns, and draw well-reasoned conclusions.
- Full marks are awarded for insightful analysis, partial marks for partial analysis, and no marks for an inadequate or unrelated response.
4. Synthesis : Maximum marks 2
- Synthesis refers to the student’s ability to integrate information, concepts, or theories from various sources to create new and original ideas or solutions.
- Teachers evaluate the student’s capacity to merge knowledge from different disciplines or contexts and generate comprehensive insights.
- Full marks are given for a well-synthesized response, partial marks for partial synthesis, and no marks for an unrelated response.
5. Evaluation : Maximum marks 2
- This criterion assesses the student’s ability to make value judgments and critically assess the information presented in the exam.
- Teachers examine how effectively students can distinguish between valid and invalid arguments, identify strengths and weaknesses, and formulate well-reasoned opinions.
- Full marks are awarded for a critical and coherent evaluation, partial marks for a somewhat critical evaluation, and no marks for an inadequate or irrelevant response.
By utilizing these criteria, the 10-point grading system enables educators to comprehensively evaluate students’ academic performance, emphasizing their understanding, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation skills.