However, while the *requirements* are the same, the *context* of an application can be different. Holistic review considers the applicant's entire profile, and this includes acknowledging the challenges and triumphs that might be unique to an applicant's background. This could include:
* Overcoming socioeconomic disadvantages: An applicant from an under-resourced community might demonstrate exceptional resilience and achievement in the face of significant obstacles. This is not a special "minority" advantage, but rather a demonstration of strength and character that admissions committees value in *all* applicants.
* Unique perspectives and experiences: Students from diverse backgrounds often bring unique perspectives and experiences that enrich the campus community. This is valued, but not because of their race or ethnicity itself, but because of the contribution their background makes to the educational environment.
* Strong academic record: This is crucial for all applicants, regardless of background. A strong GPA, rigorous coursework, and high standardized test scores (where applicable) are essential components of a competitive application.
* Extracurricular activities and leadership: Demonstrated leadership, significant involvement in extracurricular activities, and commitment to service show well-roundedness and initiative – highly valued qualities in all applicants.
* Essays and letters of recommendation: These provide crucial insights into the applicant's personality, motivations, and potential. Authenticity and compelling storytelling are key.
In short: There are no special "minority" requirements. The criteria for admission are the same for everyone, but the way an applicant's background informs their application narrative can be a significant factor in the holistic review process. The goal is to find a diverse class of highly qualified students who will contribute to the university community.