- The statement failed to address the systemic issues of racism and segregation that King had highlighted in his letter. Instead, the clergymen focused on urging King to be patient and to trust the "goodwill" of white people. This response demonstrated a lack of understanding of the urgency and severity of the civil rights struggle and failed to offer any concrete solutions or actions to address the injustices that African Americans were facing.
- The statement was paternalistic and condescending in its tone. The clergymen referred to King as "our dear brother" and used language that implied that he was a child or a subordinate who needed to be guided and disciplined. This tone further undermined the credibility of the statement and alienated many people who were sympathetic to the civil rights movement.
- The statement was not representative of all white clergy or the broader white community. While the clergymen who signed the statement were influential figures, they did not speak for all white people. In fact, many white Americans, including clergy members, were supportive of the civil rights movement and agreed with King's criticisms of segregation and racial inequality.
- The statement came too late to have a significant impact. King's letter was published in April 1963, and the clergymen's statement was not issued until May 14. By this time, the civil rights movement had already gained significant momentum and was receiving widespread attention and support. The statement therefore had little effect in shaping public opinion or in influencing the course of events.