* Funding and financial transparency: Concerns exist about the fairness and transparency of their funding models. Some argue that funding formulas are not equitable compared to maintained schools and that there is a lack of transparency in how funds are allocated and spent. There have been instances of financial mismanagement highlighted in individual free schools.
* Selection and admissions: While legally prohibited from selecting pupils based on academic ability, some critics argue that free schools indirectly select pupils through means such as their location, admissions policies, or the types of activities offered. This can exacerbate existing inequalities in education.
* Curriculum and ethos: Critics argue that some free schools have a narrow curriculum, focusing on specific subjects or teaching styles, potentially limiting pupils' broader educational opportunities. Concerns have also been raised about the religious or ideological ethos of some free schools and their potential impact on inclusive education.
* Accountability and governance: Questions have been raised about the level of accountability of free schools compared to maintained schools. The governance structures of some free schools have been scrutinized, with concerns about conflicts of interest and a lack of oversight.
* Impact on school choice and diversity: Concerns have been raised about the impact of free schools on the overall school landscape. Some critics argue that they fragment the system and do not necessarily improve educational outcomes for all children, potentially leading to less diverse school options in certain areas.
It's important to note that these are criticisms leveled against *some* free schools, and not a blanket condemnation of the entire sector. Many free schools are successful and provide valuable educational opportunities. However, the issues listed above represent significant ongoing debates and challenges surrounding the free school model.