Is a DO certification better then MD for doctors?

There's no single answer to whether a DO (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine) certification is "better" than an MD (Doctor of Medicine) certification. Both are licensed physicians who can practice medicine in all 50 states, and both undergo rigorous training and licensing. The key difference lies in their philosophical approach to medicine and, to a lesser extent, their training:

* Philosophical Approach: DOs receive training in osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), a hands-on approach to diagnosis and treatment that emphasizes the musculoskeletal system's role in overall health. MDs do not receive this specific training. However, many MDs incorporate elements of manipulative techniques in their practice.

* Training Differences: While the core medical education is very similar, some subtle differences exist in curriculum emphasis and clinical rotations. These differences are becoming increasingly less significant as medical schools converge on similar standards.

* Specialization: Both DOs and MDs can pursue all medical specialties. There is no restriction on the types of medical specializations either can pursue.

In short: "Better" is subjective and depends on individual priorities. A DO might be preferred by someone interested in a more holistic approach, emphasizing OMT, while an MD path might suit someone else better. Ultimately, both are fully qualified physicians capable of providing high-quality care. The choice between them shouldn't be a factor in selecting a physician. Instead, focus on the physician's experience, skills, and reputation.