Here's why:
* Arnold's Definition: Arnold, in his essay "The Function of Criticism at the Present Time" (1864), argues that criticism should be "disinterested" - free from personal biases, prejudices, or vested interests. He believed that this objectivity allowed critics to judge literature on its own merits and contribute to a more informed and enlightened public discourse.
* The Importance of "Seeing Things as They Are": For Arnold, disinterestedness was crucial for a critic to "see things as they are" and discern the true value of a work. This meant being detached from personal opinions, political affiliations, and social pressures that could cloud one's judgment.
* The Role of Criticism: Arnold believed that criticism played a vital role in refining the public's taste and fostering intellectual growth. Disinterested criticism, in his view, could elevate society by promoting high standards and encouraging a deeper appreciation for literature.
While other critics may have contributed to the idea of disinterestedness, Arnold's articulation of this concept in his writings has solidified his association with it.
It's important to note that the concept of disinterestedness has been debated and challenged over time. Some critics argue that it is impossible to be completely objective, while others maintain that striving for objectivity is crucial for good criticism. Nonetheless, Arnold's vision of disinterestedness continues to be influential and debated within literary criticism.