Morel's critique is primarily based on his firsthand experiences in the Congo region, where he witnessed firsthand the brutal practices and oppression of King Leopold's regime. He exposes the inhumane treatment, the ruthless exploitation of natural resources, the forced labor, the mutilations, and the high mortality rates among the indigenous population. By bringing to light these atrocities, Morel challenges the benevolent and progressive narrative of white colonization.
Whether Morel's critique is fair and accurate is subjective and debatable. While his observations and accounts are largely supported by historical evidence and reports, some argue that he exaggerated certain aspects to emphasize the severity of the situation and stir public opinion. Despite this, Morel's work undoubtedly contributed to the international outrage and scrutiny of the colonial practices in the Congo Free State, leading to eventual reforms.
In contrast to Kipling's celebratory tone and vision of white man as a benevolent force bringing civilization and advancement, Morel's essay exposes the darker and more sinister side of European colonialism in Africa. His critique seeks to raise awareness about the human suffering and the destructive impact of colonial policies on African societies, while challenging the self-righteous perception of white man's role in colonization.
Overall, Morel's excerpt presents a vastly different perspective from Kipling's, emphasizing the destructive consequences and human rights violations inherent in European colonialism, rather than glorifying its purported benefits. Whether his critique is deemed entirely accurate or not, it certainly brought important attention to the horrors of the Congo Free State and played a significant role in shaping the wider discourse on colonization during that time.