Here's why this is not only possible but also common:
* Characters are separate entities: Authors create characters that are distinct from themselves. These characters have their own motivations, beliefs, and flaws. Even if an author wouldn't personally act in a certain way, they can still create a believable character who would.
* Exploring perspectives: Disagreements between authors and characters allow for exploring diverse viewpoints. By crafting characters who hold contrasting opinions, authors can challenge readers to consider different perspectives and engage in critical thinking.
* Creating conflict and tension: Conflict between a character's actions and the author's values can create compelling narratives. It can make a story more exciting and relatable, as readers can identify with the struggle of the character or ponder the consequences of their choices.
* Literary devices: Disagreements can be a powerful literary device. Authors can use them to create irony, satire, or even to highlight their own values through the character's actions.
Examples:
* "The Catcher in the Rye" by J.D. Salinger: While Salinger may not have agreed with Holden Caulfield's cynical worldview, he skillfully created a character that resonates with teenage angst and alienation.
* "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" by Mark Twain: Mark Twain, a staunch abolitionist, wrote a character who initially embodies racist prejudices. However, through Huckleberry's journey, Twain exposes the absurdity of slavery and advocates for equality.
Conclusion:
Disagreements between authors and their characters can enrich narratives, create compelling conflicts, and offer opportunities for exploring diverse perspectives. It's a fundamental aspect of storytelling that allows for complex characters and thought-provoking stories.