When referencing a book in paper do you put the year published?

You generally do not put the year published when referencing a book in a paper using the standard format for academic citations.

Here's why:

* Clarity and focus: The primary goal of a citation is to allow the reader to easily find the source. Including the publication year can clutter the reference and make it harder to scan.

* Emphasis on author and title: The author and title of the book are the most important elements for identifying the source.

* Potential for confusion: Some books have multiple editions published over time. Including the publication year could lead to confusion about which edition is being cited.

However, there are exceptions:

* Specific editions: If you are referring to a specific edition of a book, you should include the year of publication for that edition.

* Historical research: In some cases, the year of publication might be relevant to your research, such as when analyzing a book's historical context.

* Specific formatting styles: Some citation styles, like Chicago, require the publication year for all references.

Always follow the guidelines of the specific citation style you are using.

For example, a reference in MLA format would look like this:

Last name, First name. *Title of Book*. Publisher, Year of Publication.

Example:

Smith, John. *The History of Science*. Oxford University Press, 2005.

Learnify Hub © www.0685.com All Rights Reserved