Here's why it's not considered a narrative poem:
* Focus on emotions and experiences: The poem focuses on the speaker's internal thoughts and feelings about being in love. It explores the emotional and psychological aspects of love rather than presenting a specific event or series of events.
* Lack of clear plot: There's no clear progression of events or a conflict that needs resolving. The poem explores love in a more abstract and introspective way.
* Descriptive and lyrical language: Brooks uses vivid imagery, metaphors, and symbolism to evoke the feeling of being in love. This emphasizes the emotional impact rather than a specific narrative.
However, it can be argued that "To Be in Love" exhibits narrative elements in a broader sense:
* The poem does have a structure: The poem is divided into three stanzas, each exploring a different aspect of love. This structure creates a sense of progression and allows the poem to unfold in a specific order.
* The speaker's experience is presented in a chronological order: The poem starts with the initial experience of love and progresses to the speaker's realization of the depth of their feelings.
Ultimately, whether "To Be in Love" is a narrative poem is a matter of interpretation. While it doesn't follow the traditional narrative structure, it does present a sequence of thoughts and feelings that could be seen as a narrative experience.