Lack of Character Development: Critics argue that the characters in "The Snake" lack depth and development. They remain one-dimensional, with little exploration of their motivations, feelings, or complexities. This can leave the reader feeling emotionally disconnected from the story and its characters.
Simple Plot: The plot of "The Snake" is considered by some critics as straightforward and lacking in complexity. The story's central conflict, involving a snake and its impact on a family, is viewed as predictable and lacking surprising twists or turns. This simplicity can make the novella feel predictable and lacking in suspense or tension.
Allegorical Elements: Steinbeck often used allegory in his writing, and "The Snake" is no exception. Some critics argue that the allegorical nature of the story is too heavy-handed or overly symbolic, detracting from the overall narrative. The allegorical interpretations can overshadow the characters and plot, leading to a sense of artificiality or lack of genuine emotion.
Lack of Resolution: Another critique of "The Snake" is the perceived lack of resolution or a satisfying conclusion. Critics suggest that the story ends abruptly, leaving some plotlines unresolved. This can create a sense of inconclusiveness or dissatisfaction for the reader, as they may feel that important questions or conflicts remain unanswered.
Despite these criticisms, "The Snake" is still regarded as a significant work of literature, recognized for its thought-provoking themes and symbolism, as well as Steinbeck's evocative writing style. It remains an important part of Steinbeck's literary oeuvre and continues to be studied and analyzed for its insights into human nature, societal issues, and the role of symbols in storytelling.