Here's a breakdown:
* The Strike: The strike was sparked by a sudden price increase in the newspapers that the newsboys sold. This meant they were making less money, and many were struggling to make ends meet.
* Pulitzer's Role: While Pulitzer did not directly instigate the strike, he opposed the newsboys' demands and refused to lower the price. He believed the price increase was necessary and that the newsboys were simply trying to take advantage of the situation.
* Public Opinion: The *New York World* initially downplayed the strike and tried to portray the newsboys as lazy and ungrateful. However, as the strike gained momentum and public sympathy for the boys grew, Pulitzer's stance became increasingly unpopular.
* Resolution: The strike eventually ended with a compromise, but it highlighted the harsh realities of child labor and the power of organized labor. The strike also solidified Pulitzer's reputation as a powerful media figure who was willing to take a hard line against what he perceived as unfair demands.
It's important to note that while Pulitzer was against the strike, he also had a complex relationship with the newsboys. He understood their plight and even ran articles about the strike in his paper. However, he ultimately believed the newsboys needed to accept the reality of the situation and move on.