Here's a breakdown:
* "A writer of prose knows enough what he is writing about..." This implies the writer has expertise and a deep understanding of the topic.
* "...may omit things that and the reader if truly enough?" This is where the statement gets tricky. It's suggesting that the writer can leave out information, and the reader, with enough knowledge and understanding, will still grasp the meaning.
Here's why this works:
* Shared Knowledge: Writers often rely on shared knowledge between themselves and the reader. If both understand the context, specific details might not be necessary.
* Subtext: A skilled writer can convey meaning through subtle clues, imagery, and the overall tone of their writing. This is called subtext.
* Reader Engagement: By leaving out details, a writer can engage the reader more actively. The reader has to fill in the gaps, which creates a more dynamic and meaningful experience.
However, there are some things to consider:
* Clarity: While omitting details can be effective, it's crucial to ensure the writing remains clear and understandable. Too much omission can lead to confusion.
* Audience: The level of knowledge and understanding your audience has will influence how much you can omit.
* Purpose: The purpose of your writing will also determine how much information is essential.
In short, a writer's knowledge of their subject matter allows them to make strategic omissions, relying on the reader's understanding and engaging them in the process of interpreting meaning.