Here's a breakdown:
* Voluntary Act: This is a conscious act performed by the individual, as opposed to a reflex action or an act performed while unconscious or under duress. For example, if someone involuntarily spasms and strikes another person, that wouldn't generally be considered a voluntary act for criminal liability purposes.
* Omission: While the act requirement usually involves a positive act, it also encompasses omissions or failures to act when there's a legal duty to do so. This duty can arise from a statute, contract, special relationship (e.g., parent-child), or the creation of a perilous situation. For instance, failing to provide for a dependent child could be a criminal offense if a duty to care exists.
* Contrast with Mens Rea: The act requirement is distinct from *mens rea*, which is the guilty mind or mental state required for a crime. Both *actus reus* (the guilty act) and *mens rea* must be present for most crimes. A person could have the intent to commit a crime (mens rea), but without the corresponding act (actus reus), they generally cannot be convicted.
In short, the act requirement ensures that individuals are held responsible for their actions, not just their thoughts. The specific requirements for what constitutes a "voluntary act" and a "legal duty to act" can vary based on the jurisdiction and the specific crime.