There are several reasons why it makes sense for counties to be responsible for maintaining school buildings. First, counties are typically responsible for providing other public services that are closely related to education, such as transportation, public safety, and health care. By having a single entity responsible for both education and these other services, it is easier to coordinate planning and ensure that all of these services are working together effectively.
Second, counties are better able to respond quickly and effectively to the needs of their schools. For example, if a school building needs repairs, the county can send a team of workers to address the problem right away. This is important because delays in repairs can disrupt students' education and make it difficult for them to learn.
Third, counties are more accountable to the public for the condition of their schools. If a school building is in poor condition, the county is more likely to be held accountable by the public than the national government. This accountability helps to ensure that counties take good care of their schools.
Of course, there are also arguments for having the national government maintain school buildings. For example, some argue that the national government is better able to ensure that all schools are meeting the same standards. However, the benefits of having counties maintain school buildings generally outweigh the benefits of having the national government do it.
In conclusion, there are several reasons why it makes sense for counties to be responsible for maintaining school buildings. By having a single entity responsible for both education and other public services, it is easier to coordinate planning and ensure that all of these services are working together effectively. Counties are better able to respond quickly and effectively to the needs of their schools, and they are more accountable to the public for the condition of their schools.