* Agreement with the Ideal: Many readers would agree with Benitez's idealistic vision of an educated Filipino. His emphasis on character, civic responsibility, and national consciousness resonates with those who value a holistic approach to education, one that fosters not only intellectual prowess but also moral integrity and a commitment to the betterment of society. The qualities he outlines—strength of character, integrity, social responsibility, and a love of country—remain aspirational goals.
* Critique of the Colonial System: Implicit in Benitez's essay is a critique of the colonial education system. He subtly challenges the limitations of a system that might prioritize rote learning and subservience over critical thinking and national identity. Readers might react strongly to this implied criticism of colonial influence on the formation of Filipino identity and education.
* Debate on the Definition of "Educated": Benitez's definition of an educated Filipino is the central focus and source of varied reactions. Some might find his emphasis on moral and civic virtues insufficiently focused on intellectual development, while others might see his emphasis on nationalistic sentiments as outdated or potentially exclusionary. The debate lies in whether his definition is comprehensive or leaves out crucial aspects of education, such as creativity, critical thinking, or global citizenship.
* Appreciation for the Historical Context: Reading the essay requires an understanding of its historical context—the Philippines under American colonial rule. This understanding shapes the reader's reaction, prompting reflections on the struggles for national identity and the role of education in shaping a nation's future. The essay becomes a historical document highlighting the aspirations of a people striving for independence and self-determination.
* Relevance to Modern Times: Many readers will reflect on the continued relevance of Benitez's ideals today. Despite being written decades ago, the questions of national identity, civic duty, and the purpose of education remain highly pertinent. This prompts reflection on how well modern Filipino education meets the standards Benitez set forth.
In conclusion, the reaction to Benitez's essay is multifaceted and depends greatly on the individual reader's background, perspective, and understanding of the historical circumstances in which it was written. It serves as a potent catalyst for discussion on the aims and values of education, then and now.