However, Ohio's public schools are guided by the state's curriculum standards, which generally align with national science standards. These standards emphasize the teaching of evolution as a core component of biology education. Schools are expected to teach science based on the scientific method and established scientific consensus.
While creationism isn't explicitly forbidden, attempts to present it as a scientifically equivalent alternative to evolution would likely violate the principle of teaching science accurately and objectively. A teacher couldn't, for example, dedicate equal time to teaching creationism alongside evolution as if they were both scientifically supported theories. Doing so might be seen as promoting a particular religious viewpoint in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
In short, the legal situation in Ohio is one of *de facto* inclusion of evolution and *de facto* exclusion of creationism as a scientifically valid alternative. The absence of specific legislation on this matter means the practical application hinges on following established science standards and avoiding the unconstitutional endorsement of religion. Individual school districts might have policies that provide additional guidance, but these must still comply with state and federal law.