* Limited Scope: The focus is solely on one high school. A research paper needs a broader perspective, perhaps examining the effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of free driver's education programs at the state, regional, or national level. The experience of a single high school is anecdotal and doesn't provide generalizable conclusions.
* Lack of Research Questions: The statement is essentially a conclusion, not a question. A research paper needs clear, testable research questions. For example, "What is the correlation between access to free driver's education and teen driving accident rates?" or "What are the economic impacts of publicly funded driver's education programs?"
* Bias and Advocacy: The phrasing implies a desired outcome (free driver's ed). Research should be objective and present evidence to support or refute various viewpoints, not simply advocate for one side. A balanced research paper would explore the pros and cons of free driver's education, considering factors like cost, effectiveness, and alternative approaches.
* Difficulty in Data Collection: Gathering sufficient and reliable data for a single high school might be challenging, particularly regarding the long-term impacts of such a program. A broader study would offer more opportunities for robust data collection and analysis.
To make this a more suitable research topic, it needs to be reframed with a broader focus and a more objective, research-oriented approach.