The term often carries negative connotations because:
* It suggests a lack of individual agency: Students are seen as clay to be shaped, rather than active participants in their own learning and development. This can stifle creativity, critical thinking, and independent thought.
* It can be associated with indoctrination: The "mould" might represent a particular ideology, religion, or social structure, and the educational process prioritizes adherence to that system over critical examination.
* It overlooks diverse learning styles and needs: A one-size-fits-all approach to moulding students doesn't account for individual differences in learning, personality, and aspirations.
While some might argue that certain aspects of education inherently involve shaping students' values and behaviors (e.g., teaching respect, responsibility, and ethical conduct), the term "moulding" highlights a potentially problematic approach that prioritizes conformity over individual development. A more positive and contemporary approach emphasizes fostering critical thinking, creativity, and self-directed learning, allowing students to develop their own identities and values within a supportive and stimulating environment.