- Increased bargaining power for unions: The legal right to strike gives unions a powerful tool to pressure management to meet their demands. This can help to level the playing field between unions and management and ensure that workers have a voice in their workplace.
- Improved wages and benefits for workers: Strikes can often lead to improved wages and benefits for workers. This is because management is often willing to make concessions in order to avoid the disruption of a strike.
- Increased job security for workers: Strikes can also help to protect jobs. This is because management is less likely to lay off workers if they know that the workers can legally strike in response.
- Increased awareness of workers' rights: Strikes can also help to raise awareness of workers' rights. This can help to ensure that workers are treated fairly by their employers.
Demerits of strike agitation legal approach in union management relations:
- Disruption of business: Strikes can cause significant disruption to business operations. This can lead to lost productivity and profits, as well as job losses.
- Increased costs for consumers: Strikes can also lead to increased costs for consumers. This is because businesses may pass on the costs of a strike to their customers in the form of higher prices.
- Public inconvenience: Strikes can also cause public inconvenience. This is because strikes can disrupt public transportation, schools, and other essential services.
- Loss of public support: Strikes can also lead to a loss of public support for unions. This is because the public may view strikes as disruptive and unnecessary.
Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to use strike agitation as a legal approach in union management relations is a difficult one. There are both potential benefits and risks associated with this approach, and it is important to weigh the pros and cons carefully before deciding whether or not to use it.