Evidence-based practice research papers should include different components. Specifically, a paper should include a statement of aims, hypothesis, description of the author's methodology, data collected, analysis of data and discussion of the findings. To grade a research paper, grade each of these components. However, give more weight to certain components (for instance, data collection, analysis and discussion) as you see fit for the particular assignment.
One method for assessing an evidence-based practice research paper is to consider how the author reconciles clinical evidence with external evidence, such as scholarly research published in the field. Normally, evidence-based research papers incorporate original data (data gathered by the author in an experiment or study) and data and research published by experts in the field. Assess how the author uses these two forms of evidence in tandem. For instance, evaluate how effectively the author uses external research to support or elaborate upon findings of clinical research
To grade an evidenced-based practice research paper, evaluate the author's critical engagement with research. Importantly, a strong research paper does not simply repeat or summarize another scholar's findings. Rather, it critically and thoughtfully engages such findings, commenting on the strengths and limitations of research methods and discussing the implications of research. Critique the author's critique by assessing how skillfully he uses research.
Evidenced-based practice is constantly evolving to accommodate new trends and findings in the field. Data changes, but so do the methods of data collection and the techniques used to interpret data. Research papers in evidence-based practice have to have currency, or they are useless. Evaluate the author's paper by considering how meaningfully it contributes to the current discourse.. Asses how well the author situates her research in the context of the current body of research to affirm its relevancy and usefulness.