* Making grammar practical and relatable: Flaccus didn't treat grammar as an abstract exercise. His scholarship was known for its practicality and connection to daily life. This likely extended to his teaching, meaning he showed students the relevance of grammar to understanding literature, law, and even politics. He didn't just teach rules; he showed how those rules worked in real-world contexts.
* Emphasis on clear and organized presentation: Flaccus's surviving works are characterized by clarity and meticulous organization. This suggests he likely prioritized structuring his lessons in a similar fashion, making the learning process easier to follow and less daunting.
* Possibly incorporating interactive elements: While direct evidence is lacking, it's plausible he employed methods beyond simple lectures. Perhaps he used discussions, exercises, or even games to reinforce concepts and keep students actively involved. His comprehensive understanding of language likely allowed him to create engaging scenarios and examples.
* Building a strong teacher-student relationship: Flaccus's reputation suggests he inspired respect and admiration in his pupils. A strong, positive relationship based on mutual respect would have made the learning experience more rewarding and less coercive.
In short, Flaccus's success likely stemmed from his ability to make the subject matter engaging, relevant, and well-organized, creating a learning environment that fostered curiosity and a desire to learn rather than relying on coercion. His legacy is one of scholarship and clarity, suggesting his teaching mirrored these qualities.