What is one key difference between the critical acclaim received by Edgar Allan Poe and that Stephen King anonymous 2 years ago All I could find. SHOW FULL ANSWER Looking for som?

It seems like you're asking about a key difference between the critical acclaim received by Edgar Allan Poe and Stephen King. While Poe is often recognized for his literary merit and innovation within the gothic horror genre, Stephen King's acclaim comes from a different angle.

Here's one key difference:

* Poe's acclaim focuses on his artistry and contribution to literary form. He's celebrated for his mastery of language, his use of symbolism and allegory, and his psychological exploration of the human condition within the context of horror. Critics often analyze his work as a reflection of his personal struggles and the anxieties of his time.

* King's acclaim is often tied to his immense popularity and commercial success. While his work is critically respected, it's also considered to be highly accessible and entertaining. Critics often analyze his work in terms of its cultural impact and its ability to tap into universal fears and anxieties.

Therefore, while both authors are considered masters of horror, the nature of their critical acclaim differs. Poe's acclaim is focused on his artistry and literary merit, while King's acclaim is often linked to his popularity and commercial success.

It's worth noting that this is a simplification, and both authors have received acclaim for various aspects of their work. However, this difference in focus highlights a key distinction in how their contributions to the horror genre are perceived.