* The aftermath of the rebellion's failure: The novel details the brutal consequences for those involved in the rebellion, showing the executions and punishments inflicted by the English. This emphasizes the devastating loss for the Powhatan Confederacy and the fragility of their alliances.
* Samuell's journey and reconciliation (or lack thereof): Samuell's post-rebellion experiences show the lingering effects of the violence and his personal struggles with his choices. His eventual reconciliation (or lack thereof) with his family and the Powhatan community contributes to the falling action. This is crucial because it shows the lasting psychological toll on the characters and the enduring tensions between the colonists and the indigenous population.
* The changing dynamics of power: The falling action reveals a shift in the power balance between the English colonists and the Powhatan people. The rebellion's failure leaves the Powhatan in a weakened position, highlighting the colonists' growing dominance, even as the tensions and potential for future conflict remain.
* The lingering tension and uncertainty: The ending doesn't offer a neat resolution. It leaves the reader with a sense of unresolved conflict and uncertainty about the future, emphasizing the ongoing struggle for survival and power in the nascent colony. The seeds of future conflict are clearly sown.
Essentially, the falling action of *Blood on the River* focuses on the consequences of the climax, illustrating the human cost of the rebellion and the continuing power struggles that shape the early days of the Jamestown settlement. It’s a slow burn decline towards a tense and ambiguous conclusion, rather than a sharp, defined segment.