1. The "good" character (ἀγαθός) and the "bad" character (κακός).
* These are not necessarily moral judgments but rather describe characters who act in accordance with or against the prevailing ethos of the society in which they are set.
* A "good" character acts in accordance with the societal norms and expectations, while a "bad" character does not.
2. The "complex" character (σύνθετος) and the "simple" character (ἁπλοῦς).
* A complex character is one who experiences a significant change in fortune, often brought about by a tragic flaw.
* A simple character does not experience such a significant change and generally remains consistent throughout the play.
However, Aristotle doesn't simply label characters as "good" or "bad," "complex" or "simple." Instead, he explores how these character types contribute to the overall unity and coherence of the drama. He argues that characters should be believable and consistent, even if they are ultimately flawed. He also emphasizes the importance of recognition (anagnorisis) where a character comes to understand the true nature of their situation or their own actions.
Therefore, it's not so much about specific character *types* as it is about the function and purpose of characters within the dramatic structure.
It's worth noting that Aristotle's *Poetics* is a complex work, and many different interpretations of his ideas have been proposed over the centuries. The above is just a brief overview of his key points regarding character.