* Imagery is a tool, not a defining characteristic: Both free verse and traditional poets can utilize imagery extensively or sparingly. It's about the poet's individual style and the poem's content.
* Free verse focuses on rhythm and flow: Free verse poetry doesn't adhere to traditional rhyme and meter, but it emphasizes the natural flow of language and rhythm. This focus on rhythm doesn't inherently imply more imagery.
* Traditional poetry also employs imagery: Sonnets, haikus, and other traditional forms often use vivid imagery to create powerful effects.
However, free verse can create opportunities for expansive imagery:
* Freedom from structure: The absence of strict form allows poets to explore unconventional imagery and metaphors, leading to sometimes more elaborate and abstract imagery.
* Emphasis on language: Free verse often prioritizes the impact of individual words and phrases, which can be used to create evocative imagery.
In conclusion:
It's not a matter of free verse poets *always* using more imagery. Both free verse and traditional poets can effectively employ imagery depending on their style and the specific poem. Free verse can provide a framework for more expansive and unconventional imagery, but it's not a guarantee.