Why does poet take the loss of deserted village personally?

It's important to remember that the "deserted village" is a fictional construct, a poetic device, and not an actual place. The poet, Oliver Goldsmith, does not take the loss of an actual village personally. However, he uses the imagined loss to explore broader themes that resonate with his time and continue to have relevance:

Here's why the poem feels personal and its themes connect with readers:

* The "village" symbolizes a way of life: Goldsmith's poem depicts a rural village that represents traditional values, community, and a slower, simpler life. This idyllic vision is threatened by the forces of industrialization and urbanization, which were changing the social landscape in 18th-century England.

* Loss of innocence and tradition: The poem laments the loss of a way of life that is disappearing due to economic and social changes. This resonates with a sense of loss and nostalgia that many people can relate to, even today.

* Social critique: The poem critiques the injustices and inequalities caused by the changes happening in society. The wealthy landlords are seen as responsible for displacing the villagers, while the poor are left to suffer. This theme of social injustice continues to be relevant in modern times.

* Evocative language: Goldsmith's use of imagery and language is deeply affecting, painting a vivid picture of the village's beauty and the plight of its inhabitants. This helps the reader connect emotionally to the poem and its themes.

In short, while the "deserted village" is fictional, Goldsmith uses it as a powerful tool to explore real social and economic changes that were affecting people in his time. His poem's themes of loss, nostalgia, and social injustice continue to resonate with readers centuries later.