It's important to understand that while the book was a critical examination of the military-industrial complex, it didn't directly cause any specific policy changes or legal action. It was more of a piece of investigative journalism that highlighted a potential problem, but it didn't have the same impact as a legal case or a congressional investigation.
Here's why:
* Lack of Concrete Evidence: "The Warfare State" is a book of investigative reporting, and while it presents strong arguments, it doesn't rely on concrete evidence that would lead to legal action.
* No Direct Action from the Government: The book itself did not spark any formal investigations or official responses from the government.
* Limited Impact on Public Discourse: While "The Warfare State" received some attention, it didn't become a major bestseller or dominate public discourse in a way that could have directly influenced policy.
However, "The Warfare State" contributed to the growing public awareness of the military-industrial complex and its potential influence on government policy. This contributed to the ongoing debate about military spending, defense contracts, and the relationship between the government and private industry.
In conclusion, while "The Warfare State" was a significant piece of investigative journalism, it did not lead to any direct corrective actions due to its nature as a book of reporting rather than a legal case or a formal investigation.