* Ambiguous Intent: The website's content is often presented in a way that could be interpreted as either serious or satirical. This ambiguity is a hallmark of some forms of satire, but it also makes it hard to definitively label the website.
* Mixture of Content: Return of Kings publishes a mix of articles, ranging from extreme views on gender roles and relationships to more lighthearted pieces on "manly" pursuits. This mix could be seen as a way of attracting a wider audience, or as a way of blurring the lines between seriousness and satire.
* Author's Statements: The founder, Elliot Rodger, initially claimed that his writings were satire. However, after committing a mass murder, his motivations and the nature of his website became deeply controversial. This ambiguity adds to the difficulty of labeling the site.
Ultimately, the interpretation of Return of Kings is subjective. Some people might find the website's content purely satirical, while others might see it as genuinely hateful and dangerous.
Important Note: While satire can be a powerful tool for social commentary, it is crucial to distinguish between genuine satire and content that is simply intended to spread harmful or dangerous ideologies.