Key characteristics of discipline specific discourse include:
Specialized terminology: Each discipline has its own unique vocabulary and jargon, which can include technical terms, acronyms, abbreviations, and concepts specific to that field.
Conceptual frameworks: Disciplines are shaped by particular theoretical frameworks and conceptual models that guide how practitioners think about and discuss the subject matter.
Methodologies: Disciplines often have specific research methods and methodologies that are considered appropriate and valid within that field. These methods shape how researchers collect and analyze data, and how they present their findings.
Discourse conventions: Each discipline has its own conventions for presenting information, referencing sources, and structuring texts. These conventions can include formats for scientific papers, lab reports, or artistic critiques, for example.
Rhetorical strategies: The way in which information is communicated within a discipline can vary depending on the rhetorical strategies that are valued. This might involve the use of formal or informal language, objective or subjective perspectives, or the use of persuasive or analytical arguments.
Audience and purpose: The intended audience and purpose of communication within a discipline can influence the discourse. For instance, scientific papers might be written primarily for other researchers in the same field, while business reports might be tailored for a wider audience.
Understanding discipline specific discourse is important for effectively communicating within a particular academic field. It requires familiarity with the specialized language, concepts, and practices of that discipline, and the ability to adapt one's communication style and content to fit the conventions and expectations of the discipline.