Checking for proper spelling and use of grammar can be one of the simplest forms of evaluation. Writers could be allotted a certain amount of errors for each numerical score. For example, writers could make one or two simple spelling errors and still get a rating of "excellent" overall, or a numerical score of eight or nine. But those who continuously make significant grammatical errors may get a rating of "unsatisfactory," or a one or two on a numerical scale.
Some instructors or editors may require their writers to produce a certain amount of work before a specific deadline. This could include first and second drafts as well as final copies. Whether there is one deadline or several, the assessment will reflect the writer's ability to submit her assignment on time. Specified story length and the ability to follow instructions may also factor in. The writer's ability to cut down or add words can easily be reflected in the assessment.
Some stories may require the incorporation of true facts of events. The story may be historical fiction or nonfiction or simply need to include a set of scientific facts. Regardless of the story, writers can be required to use real facts or events in a creative way and without bending the truth. On the other hand, for fictional stories an evaluator may assess the writer's use of original ideas. This form of evaluation may be slightly more subjective.
From rising action to illustrations, the writer's content can be evaluated in a variety of ways. If illustrations are a requirement, determine how much time and effort the writer put in, and how relevant the images are to the story. Content can also include the use of a plot graph, character development, literary devices and narrative. Like evaluating creativity, this form of assessment has the potential to be subjective.