What tense should you use when writing an art criticism paper?

The present tense is typically used when writing an art criticism paper. This is because the focus of the paper is on the artwork itself, rather than on the artist or the historical context. By using the present tense, the writer can create a sense of immediacy and directness, allowing the reader to experience the artwork in the present moment.

Here are some examples of how the present tense can be used in art criticism:

- "The painting depicts a woman sitting in a chair, her head resting in her hand. The colors are muted and the brushstrokes are loose, creating a sense of melancholy."

- "The sculptor has captured the movement and energy of the dancer, with the figure appearing to leap out of the stone."

- "The photograph captures a moment of time, with the subject frozen in mid-action."

- "The installation creates a sense of unease and disorientation, with the viewer never quite sure what is real and what is imagined."

Of course, there are some instances when it may be appropriate to use a different tense in an art criticism paper. For example, the past tense may be used to discuss the history or context of an artwork, or to provide biographical information about the artist. The future tense may be used to speculate on the future impact of an artwork, or to make predictions about its future value.

Ultimately, the choice of tense in an art criticism paper will depend on the specific focus and purpose of the paper. By carefully considering the tense they use, writers can effectively communicate their ideas about the artwork and create a compelling and engaging piece of writing.