When reading a literary review you should except the critic writes as true?

It's important to remember that literary reviews are subjective interpretations, not absolute truths. While you can learn a lot from a literary review, you shouldn't accept everything the critic says as gospel.

Here's why:

* Personal Opinions: Critics bring their own experiences, beliefs, and biases to their analysis.

* Different Perspectives: Two critics can read the same work and arrive at completely different conclusions.

* Changing Critical Standards: Literary criticism evolves over time. What's considered a "good" book today might have been a "bad" book in the past.

Instead of accepting everything as true, consider these approaches:

* Look for evidence: Does the critic support their claims with specific examples from the text?

* Consider the critic's background: What are their credentials? Are they known for a particular critical lens?

* Read multiple reviews: Comparing different perspectives can give you a richer understanding of the work.

* Form your own opinion: Don't be afraid to disagree with the critic. Literary analysis is about engaging with the text and forming your own conclusions.

Remember, literary reviews are valuable resources for exploring different ways of reading and understanding a work. But they are not the final word. You should always engage with the text yourself and form your own informed opinion.