F. Scott Fitzgerald:
* Style: Fitzgerald's prose is known for its lyrical beauty, evocative imagery, and meticulous attention to detail. He masterfully crafts elegant sentences and uses vivid language to capture the decadence and glamour of the Jazz Age.
* Themes: Fitzgerald explores themes of love, loss, disillusionment, the American Dream, and the complexities of human relationships. His works often depict the struggles of individuals caught between their ideals and the harsh realities of life.
E.E. Cummings:
* Style: Cummings's poetry is unconventional and experimental, featuring unconventional punctuation, capitalization, and typography. He plays with language, breaking traditional grammatical rules to create a unique and powerful effect.
* Themes: Cummings's poetry is often concerned with the themes of love, beauty, freedom, and the importance of individual expression. He celebrates individuality and challenges societal norms.
Sinclair Lewis:
* Style: Lewis's writing is characterized by its sharp social commentary and satirical wit. He uses realistic and often gritty detail to portray the hypocrisy and flaws of American society.
* Themes: Lewis critiques materialism, hypocrisy, conformity, and the American Dream's darker side. His works often portray the struggles of ordinary people against societal pressures and the pursuit of personal happiness.
Commonalities:
* Social Commentary: All three authors were critical of American society, albeit in different ways.
* Exploration of Human Nature: They delve into the complexities of human emotions, relationships, and the search for meaning.
* Influence on American Literature: Their works have left a lasting mark on American literature, influencing generations of writers.
In Conclusion:
The best way to characterize their writing is to highlight their unique styles and thematic focuses. Fitzgerald's prose is lyrical and evocative, Cummings's poetry is unconventional and experimental, and Lewis's writing is sharp and satirical. While they share a common interest in social commentary and human nature, their approaches and styles are distinctly different.