How might news reports differ if freedom of speech and the press were not part constitution?

Bias: Without the first Amendment guarantee of freedom of speech and the press, news reporting could be more biased. This is because the government could have more control over what information is reported and how it is reported. Without First Amendment protections, certain perspectives and viewpoints may be suppressed, while others are amplified, leading to a distorted and incomplete portrayal of events.

Censorship: Without freedom of the press, news reporting would likely be subject to more government censorship. The government could prevent the publication of certain news stories or information that it deems sensitive or critical of its actions

*Limited coverage of important issues*: News organizations might be less willing to investigate or report on controversial topics or stories that could result in legal consequences. This could limit public access to important information and stories that hold those in power accountable.

Propaganda: In the absence of constitutional protection, news reporting could be used as a tool for spreading propaganda by the government or other powerful entities. News outlets could be pressured to promote certain agendas or narratives at the expense of accurate and fair reporting.